Refugees, Guilt and Entitlement
Some months back,
two sets of refugees who were not exactly being welcomed where they landed (or
tried to land) was making headlines. Europe started turning its back on the
Libyans who were trying to get to Europe to flee poverty or violence in their
own countries. Remember that Europe, based on its history of turning its back
on the Jews during World War II, has a policy that every refugee has the right
to apply for asylum. But that collapses when there is a stampede (over 170,000
refugees in Italy alone in 2014), which is what has been happening over the
last year or so. Who will foot the bill? How many should each country absorb?
What if those migrants don’t integrate? What about the resentment they create
domestically when jobs are so few already?
The other set
were the Rohingyas, a Muslim minority fleeing Burma/Myanmar due to violence and
lack of even the most basic rights. Around 140,000 have fled since 2012.
Malaysia and Indonesia turned their backs on the refugees saying they don’t
have the money to absorb so many.
More
recently, I read about this Dutch battalion, DutchBat III, that during the
Yugoslavia war in 1995 failed to protect an enclave in Bosnia leading to the
slaughter of 8,000 Bosnian Muslims by Bosnian Serbs in the worst post-World War
II slaughter in Europe. Many Dutch still consider that failure to protect as a
“scar”. Dion Van Den Berg quotes a survivor:
“Now we see what happened with Srebrenica.
You delivered us into the hands of the killers, the way you delivered the Jews
to the Germans in WWII! You did not learn shit in the second world war!”
The heart says
absorb or protect such people if you have a chance. The head has to consider
economic and political costs and the lives of soldiers. But regardless of the
choice a country makes on this matter, I never get why any country should feel
guilty about their choice. Sure, individuals can feel guilt, but why countries?
And why should refugees feel entitled to anything?
Frankly, I agree
with the American stance on such matters: they’ll step in only if there’s
something in it for them or (very occasionally) for humanitarian reasons (like
the Yugoslavia war where they finally took down Milosevic). And if the rescued
shows attitude (like the French after WW II), then the typical American
response is:
“If it wasn’t for us, you’d be speaking
German.”
Jack Nicholson
sums my take perfectly in the movie, A
Few Good Men, on the entitlement aspect:
“I would rather you just said thank you,
and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a
post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.”
Your last part with Jack Nicholson reminds me of his movies I had seen. This certainly is his type of dialog!
ReplyDelete