Death by Schrödinger's Cat

Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert, wished that euthanasia were legal as his father suffered through his last days with no chance of getting better. But of course, euthanasia is illegal in most countries. (Many of the reasons why it’s illegal are perfectly valid: fear of misuse by relatives; a rash decision made by the patient when things look bleak and/or he is in agony that may well be short-lived and so on).

Months after he had ranted and wished the worst sort of deaths for lawmakers who refused to allow even terminal patients to die easily, Adams came up with this idea of a doctor-assisted suicide machine that would combined a machine with a random number generator:
“Let's say the random part of the device is attached by electronics to another part of the device that delivers a fatal dose of sedatives and poison to whoever is attached to it. You push the button and one of two things can randomly happen:
o   Nothing
o   Lethal drugs are released”
Sounds like Schrödinger’s cat, doesn’t it?! Adams takes it a step further and suggests plugging the device onto the Net. That way, the kill press is by a random guy, not a relative who can’t go through with the idea. Allow infinite presses of the switch and at some point, the patient will die.

But wait, you say, how is this different from legalizing euthanasia? As Adams explains, the difference is based on the fact that our sense of right and wrong is illogical, irrational and inconsistent. Because:
“Deaths would always be an accident in the sense that no human could reliably predict the specific outcome in advance.”
So what, you ask? Adams cites a parallel that should make things clearer:
“By analogy, the device I am describing is a lot like smoking. We know that smoking kills people but it is legal precisely because we can't predict which people will die from it. If we could, it would be illegal for sure.”

Come to think of it, Adams is right. Fatal injuries do occur in sports (remember that Aussie cricketer who died after being struck by the ball?). And yet cricket and boxing are legal sports! Perhaps Adams is right when he says, “Predictability matters”.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more