Rana and the Nazi Defense

When I heard that Rana, who is going to be tried in the US for his role in 26/11, tried to use the “I did something at the behest of a government or its official authority” defense, I was surprised that there is even such a provision in American law. And here I thought that this kind of “I was just following orders” defense was thrown out ever since the Nuremberg trials of the Nazis! But since the law exists, does it mean anyone caught spying in the US can walk free because he worked for the Chinese or Russian government?!


Talking of Nazis, guess where one of the IC-814 hijacking masterminds was recently arrested? In Chile. A South American country. The same continent where many Nazis “vanished” after World War II.


And once you think of Nazis, the next thought is inevitably about Israel. The Israelis went into South America and kidnapped a top Nazi. Sadly, our government will only make never-going-to-be-fulfilled requests for extradition in a similar situation…

Comments

  1. Your opinion regarding the provision in American law [quoting you: "Rana, who is going to be tried in the US for his role in 26/11, tried to use the “I did something at the behest of a government or its official authority” defense, I was surprised that there is even such a provision in American law."]is not what was given in the paper I read. The paper said that the American court observed that "while it has taken note of the point taken, that defense was not admissible in the law".

    Yes, Indians do not act the way the Israelis do - agreed. For the Israelis (or Jews in general so to speak) to have the attitudes they hold in such circumstances has the basis of unity found in that society. In India that kind of unity is not there today, which will limit some actions. I suppose, over the decades, we can hope for changes. We have to have the strength to stand up against those who are doing harm to everyone living in this land.

    In a way, so many things have started going wrong that the Indian society will not be able to continue debating options, instead of choosing actions with determination and courage.

    I would prefer that the basis for action comes from a coolheaded mind too, not just fanatical mindlessness at the cost of all values, which is what all the terrorists do. The fanatics have great ability for self-destruction (they can never think even one single thought constructively!) and we must smartly lead them to that deserving destiny of theirs!

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's not correct: The US court acknowledged that Rana’s argument that he is entitled to a Public Authority Defense because he acted under the authority — whether actual or apparent — of the Pakistani government and the ISI.

    But the US court rejected the defense saying, 'Defendant cannot rely on the authority of a foreign government agency or official to authorize his violations of United States federal law.'

    In other words, the US court didn't say the defense was invalid per-se, just that he couldn't violate other US laws while claiming this defense.

    See this or other sites for details
    http://m.timesofindia.com/PDATOI/articleshow/7958954.cms

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"