Was that a Non-Ruling or an Awesome Ruling?
On tricky, thorny issues, you’d expect our politicians to wiggle and find a way to not make a decision either way. But it is amazing that our courts can do the same to0. No, not by delaying the trial indefinitely but by delivering a ruling on the case that is effectively the equivalent of not ruling either way! Let me elaborate. The Aadhar case verdict was watched with great interest by many. Our courts ruled that privacy is a fundamental right, subject to reasonable restrictions. Ajay Bhushan Pandey, the CEO of UIADI (Unique Identification Authority of India) cited the exceptions allowed by the court ruling: “The Court has given examples of legitimate state interests such as national security, preventing crime, encouraging innovation and spread of knowledge, and preventing the dissipation of welfare benefits.” Ok, but does that mean Aadhar can or cannot be made mandatory? And what does that mean about the current usages of Aadhar? Are they ok or not? Here’s Pandey’s take o...